Random Joke #2: What’s 2 Plus 2

225

An engineer, a mathematician, a logician, a lawyer and an accountant apply for the position of manager of a large division. To determine who’s the most suitable applicant, the interviewer asked each of them to answer this question: “What’s 2 plus 2?”

When the interviewer asked the question to the old engineer, he immediately whips out his slide rule and shuffles it back and forth, and finally answered, “between 3.9999 and 4.0001.”

When asked the same question, the mathematician answered “4” without missing a bit.

Next, the logician answered, “Elementary! Using deductive reasoning, I deduce that it is impossible for 2 plus 2 to be equal to 1 or 2. 2 plus 2 is also not equal to 3 since 3 minus 2 is equal to 1. So, it leaves us 4, and 4 minus 2 is equal to 2. Ergo, 2 plus 2 is equal to 4!”

Next, the lawyer answered, “In the case of Nutters v. Department of Professional Tax Hounds, the Supreme Court ruled that 2 plus 2 is equal to 5.”

Finally, when asked the same question, the accountant just smirked and asked the interviewer in a low voice, “How much do you want it to be?”

It goes without saying who got the job.

Source: This is based on an old joke, I just added the logician and the lawyer.

About Edmark M. Law

My name Edmark M. Law. I work as a freelance writer, mainly writing about science and mathematics. I am an ardent hobbyist. I like to read, solve puzzles, play chess, make origami and play basketball. In addition, I dabble in magic, particularly card magic and other sleight-of-hand type magic. I live in Hong Kong. I blog at learnfunfacts.com. You can find me on Twitter @EdmarkMLaw and Facebook. My email is learnfunfacts@gmail.com
This entry was posted in Humor, Mathematics and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Random Joke #2: What’s 2 Plus 2

  1. Are we talking about beans here? If so, the answer is always five. Do I get the job?

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Fromm E.E.Cummings’ book, “is 5”:

    On the assumption that my technique is either complicated or original or both, the publishers have politely requested me to write an introduction to this book.

    At least my theory of technique, if I have one, is very far from original; nor is it complicated. I can express it in fifteen words, by quoting The Eternal Question And Immortal Answer of burlesk, viz. “Would you hit a woman with a child? — No, I’d hit her with a brick.” Like the burlesk comedian, I am abnormally fond of that precision which creates movement.

    If a poet is anybody, he is somebody to whom things made matter very little–somebody who is obsessed by Making. Like all obsessions, the Making obsession has disadvantages; for instance, my only interest in making money would be to make it. Fortunately, however, I should prefer to make almost anything else, including locomotives and roses. It is with roses and locomotives (not to mention acrobats Spring electricity Coney Island the 4th of July the eyes of mice and Niagara Falls) that my “poems” are competing.

    They are also competing with each other, with elephants, and with El Greco.

    Ineluctable preoccupation with The Verb gives a poet one priceless advantage: whereas nonmakers must content themselves with the merely undeniable fact that two times two is four, he rejoices in a purely irresistible truth (to be found, in abbreviated costume, upon the title page of the present volume.)

    E. E. Cummings.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. cb says:

    Old joke is right. I first heard it in the 80s as “geologist/ engineer / geophysicist (or well log analyst)” answers: 4 / 4.0000 / what do you want it to be?

    It applies to every profession. 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

  4. cb says:

    I also like 2 + 2 = 5, for extremely large values of 2

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Garfield Hug says:

    Darn accountant ha ha ha!!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. George says:

    That sounds about right..:)

    Liked by 1 person

  7. This had me cracking up at the end. Great joke and post!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. ederline says:

    For an economist, it would also be 5 I guess.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s