Consider this group of squares:

123789^{2 }+ 561945^{2} + 642864^{2} – 242868^{2} – 761943^{2} – 323787^{2} = 0

When looking at the calculation above, it seems that it’s not a big deal. Although the six large squares yield zero after the calculation, it is not really that peculiar.

But, try to remove the hundred thousands place or the left-most digit of each of the six numbers and perform the calculation afterwards:

23789^{2 }+ 61945^{2} + 42864^{2} – 42868^{2} – 61943^{2} – 23787^{2} = 0

After removing the left-most digits, the answer remains zero. Now, let’s see if the pattern persists by continuing to remove the left-most digit of each of the number:

3789² + 1945² + 2864² – 2868² – 1943² – 3787² = 0

789² + 945² + 864² – 868² – 943² – 787² = 0

89² + 45² + 64² – 68² – 43² – 87² = 0

9² + 5² + 4² – 8² – 3² – 7² = 0

You can also take off the right-most digits of the numbers and the total would also be zero:

123789^{2 }+ 561945^{2} + 642864^{2} – 242868^{2} – 761943^{2} – 323787^{2} = 0

12378^{2 }+ 56194^{2} + 64286^{2} – 24286^{2} – 76194^{2} – 32378^{2} = 0

1237^{2 }+ 5619^{2} + 6428^{2} – 2428^{2} – 7619^{2} – 3237^{2} = 0

123^{2 }+ 561^{2} + 642^{2} – 242^{2} – 761^{2} – 323^{2} = 0

12^{2 }+ 56^{2} + 64^{2} – 24^{2} – 76^{2} – 32^{2} = 0

1^{2 }+ 5^{2} + 6^{2} – 2^{2} – 7^{2} – 3^{2} = 0

In addition, you can remove the left-most digits and the right-most digits of the numbers simultaneously and they would still be equal to zero:

123789^{2 }+ 561945^{2} + 642864^{2} – 242868^{2} – 761943^{2} – 323787^{2} = 0

2378^{2 }+ 6194^{2} + 4286^{2} – 4286^{2} – 6194^{2} – 2378^{2} = 0

37^{2 }+ 19^{2} + 28^{2} – 28^{2} – 19^{2} – 37^{2} = 0

**Note:** For the last 2-digit squares, you can remove the left-most or the right-most digits of the numbers and the result would still be zero:

7^{2 }+ 9^{2} + 8^{2} – 8^{2} – 9^{2} – 7^{2} = 0

and

3^{2 }+ 1^{2} + 2^{2} – 2^{2} – 1^{2} – 3^{2} = 0

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

## About Edmark M. Law

My name Edmark M. Law. I work as a freelance writer, mainly writing about science and mathematics. I am an ardent hobbyist. I like to read, solve puzzles, play chess, make origami and play basketball. In addition, I dabble in magic, particularly card magic and other sleight-of-hand type magic. I live in Hong Kong.
I blog at learnfunfacts.com. You can find me on Twitter @EdmarkLaw and Facebook. My email is edmarklaw@learnfunfacts.com

That is a curious little thing. I love these math- posts.

LikeLiked by 1 person

Awww.. that’s cool!

LikeLiked by 1 person

Simply fascinating!

LikeLiked by 1 person

Take that, thou who think math has no creativity.

LikeLiked by 1 person

I always find it funny when I hear someone says that math does not involve creativity. Perhaps, they had boring teachers who were like creativity drainages back then so they had arrived at that conclusion. But there’s more to math than numbers, calculations, equations and memorizing formulas.

LikeLike

I suspect that the unfair perception stems from the way teachers generally present math in the classroom, at least in America, emphasizing process over concept or discovery.

LikeLike

Wow, that’s cool!

LikeLiked by 1 person

Sounds right🤔but what do I know as am hopeless in math🤣🤣

LikeLiked by 1 person

mind-blowing indeed!! why does that happen? is it the combination of the digits in the different numbers?

LikeLiked by 1 person

I have used a brute-force algorithm to find these numbers. So, basically, I set certain criteria that I want then let the computer find the numbers that satisfy the criteria I defined.

LikeLiked by 1 person

I see…

LikeLike

Uhuh🤔🤓😊

LikeLiked by 1 person

THAT is mind-blowing!

LikeLiked by 1 person

That’s Ramunujan level stuff.

LikeLike